advice


Explore Some Half Truths Of Coaching. 1

Coach Richard Nugent shares his expertise and knowledge in today’s guest post as he invites you to:

Explore Some Half Truths Of Coaching.

by Richard Nugent

I love writing articles for this blog. Mainly because I know the readers are like-minded and ready to learn. With this in mind this particular piece focuses on some of the beliefs that I often see coaches holding that can limit the impact they have with their clients or even their business.

My aim isn’t to offend or even to challenge your beliefs, rather to get you thinking about the ‘professional beliefs’ that you could review to help you to be even more successful.

Remember that one of the indicators of intelligence is the ability to comfortably hold two opposing views. Writing this has helped me to notice how much my beliefs have shifted over my coaching career and explore my intelligence! I hope reading it does the same for you.

Half-truth number 1 – You can’t ‘tell’ when coaching.

Really? Who says? I am not sure exactly where the rule came from, but coach must always stay out of content is certainly a very commonly held view. In my experience, the ‘none content’ phase is a useful stage in a coach’s development. For example one of my clients is a large bank. As part of their leadership development we help them to have great coaching sessions that avoid tell. It makes a real difference to them, their people and their results.

AND…recently another client of mine called me. He is a football (soccer) manager and had an imminent meeting with his Chairman to discuss transfer budgets. He wanted influencing strategies and quick. ‘How do you think you should influence him’, just wouldn’t have helped in that situation, with that client. He wanted a strategy, I gave him it and it worked. Job done, and in my view still coaching.

My final analogy is cabin crew on an aircraft. When it comes to the drinks trolley they can coach me to my preferred outcome all they like. If we need to evacuate the plane, I don’t want them to use great questions to draw out the best route from me.

Half-truth number 2 – Clients outcomes are always right.

I recently heard an eminent coach say, “the problem with client outcomes is that they are normally sh*t.” A strong view and one that took me aback. However, think carefully about your coaching experiences, how often do the outcomes that the client brings end up being what you really need to work on? How often do they change? I am sure that you will have many instances where over the course of a coaching relationship the original goals and outcomes are forgotten.

I am not saying that we shouldn’t explore and agree outcomes with clients AND they shouldn’t limit us. A client I worked with last year was adamant that the focus of our sessions should only be building her business and that any beliefs shifts that were needed would be dealt with on the NLP Master Practitioner Programme she was attending at the time. I stuck to the agreement and regretted it. To serve her best I should have focused more on what was needed session by session even if it meant her original outcomes weren’t met in full.

Half-truth number 3 – It is your responsibility to work with the clients until they are ‘done’.

Ok so we should never leave clients in the lurch. I have heard awful examples of coaches and therapists bringing issues to the surface and not having the time, energy or resources to help their client to a more resourceful place. Practices like this give our profession a bad name.

AND I believe that it is a healthy practice for coaches to end relationships with clients. Here are some signs that it’s time to consider firing a client;

  • You are coaching on the same thing and at the same level you were last year.
  • Coaching sessions with them leave you in a less resourceful state than you were before.
  • Coaching sessions with them leave them in a less resourceful state than before.
  • You resent coaching them for any reason, including financial or emotional.
  • You only took them on for the money or because you didn’t have any clients and now your practice and/or bank account has built up.

If any of these seem a little hard-nosed then they come from a belief that we almost always get the best results with clients that we love coaching. We have a responsibility to test our relationships regularly.

Half-truth number 4 – People have all of the resources they need.

In the opening to this article I mentioned that I wanted to help you to explore your beliefs and half-truth number 4 certainly led me to challenge and question mine.

I do fundamentally operate from a belief that people do have the resources to achieve whatever they want to. So that is a tick in that column right? What happens when they can’t see or feel that resourcefulness at all?

Take this example. Client A is a coach whose business is in trouble and as a result their finances are in dire straits. Their coach is not only highly successful – financially and otherwise – but also a longtime colleague and friend.

Is the coaches’ first step to help their client to be clear on what success looks like? Or to help them to into a really powerful and resourceful state so they can take massive action. Or is their first step to lend (or gift) them some money so they can get by?

Lending them money would suggest a belief that Client A didn’t have the resources, but if you were in a position to, wouldn’t you at least consider it?

Many moons ago I asked a colleague for some coaching after I led a pretty rocky workshop. She gave me the choice of a coaching session or just some time when she told me how great I was. She was building my resources rather than just believing in my resourcefulness but it was just the intervention I needed.

Half-truth number 5 – You always have to have great rapport when you coach.

I told a group of budding coaches recently that “rapport in coaching is everything. Except when it’s not.”

I still get quite taken aback by the number of coaches with a strong NLP background who forget the ‘lead’ part of pace-pace-lead. I often find that a mismatch or purposeful break of rapport is the most powerful part of the session.

I spoke to a coach about this recently who was opposed to ever ‘stepping out of the clients world view.’ It seems an interesting thought when I have often seen the likes of Richard Bandler getting great results by going straight to ‘lead’.

Half-truth number 6 – Great coaching must always have a clear end result.

Two years ago I invested tens of thousands of pounds in an intensive coaching relationship with Michael Neill. It was amazing, powerful, intense, world shifting and worth every penny. Yet I can’t really tell you what the end result was – other than a big shift. I can tell you some of the key learning’s but then that doesn’t really do justice to the power of the experience.

It is vital that clients feel that they are getting value for money and that they can express the value of the coaching relationship but the wonderful complexity of human nature and the fabulous array of ‘stuff’ that we do as coaches and with that nature leads me to question how often a specific end result is the most useful measure of a coaching relationship.

Summing up.

I would love you to have finished this article either having your beliefs challenged or reaffirmed. I mind much less whether you agree or not. This brings me onto the last point that I would love share with you.

In recent months I have experienced a greater degree of ‘crab mentality’ among coaches (click here to learn about crab mentality). Rather than celebrating and exploring other coach’s approaches and techniques I have found others in the field all too quick to label them as old, bad or wrong.

I think it’s a great time for us all to re-examine our approaches, beliefs and understanding and open up to what more we can learn and be.

About the Author/Further Resources

Richard is the M.D. of Twenty One Leadership and has coached talented people from the fields of sport and business for the last decade. Clients have credited him with everything from million pound transfers to the creation of new market leading organisations. The return on investment from his programmes stretches into the millions of Pounds, Euros and Dollars.


Which should we choose: Client or Coaching? 1

In this week’s guest post coach Sandro da Silva addresses the question that many coaches will ponder at some stage as they develop their coaching skills, experience and business.

Which should we choose: Client or Coaching?

by Sandro da Silva

In my article “A Butterfly Goes to a Coach” (posted on my own blog, click here to read it) I tried to make the boundaries between consultancy, mentoring, counseling, coaching and therapy more clear. That article has received a considerable amount of feedback so far, and has triggered some very interesting discussions and good questions.

One of those good questions is whether remaining loyal to such boundaries actually is the best for the Client. Since the Client is paramount in the coaching relationship, shouldn’t we Coaches choose to give the Client what he/she needs if the Client (or the moment) asks us to? Or should we refuse that (explicit or implicit) request and choose to stay within the boundaries of our profession? Which should we choose: the Client or Coaching?

Those of us who decide at certain moments to choose for the Client say that:

bullet point Our ultimate task as Coaches is to help the Client achieve his/her goal. There are times in which assuming a different role – that of a consultant, for example – is more beneficial to the Client and also a more efficient way of accomplishing that ultimate task.

bullet point More directive approaches from the Coach are legitimate when they are taken with the Client and his/her goal in mind. Therefore, offering explicit advice or telling the Client exactly what to do, solving a problem themselves or providing the answer the Client can’t find, leading the Client to a different perspective or way of thinking are all justified if they seem to be the best for the Client.

Those of us who choose to remain loyal to the boundaries of our profession still agree that the Client is paramount, and that it is our ultimate goal to help the Client achieve his/her goal. However,

bullet point Not only are they committed to the achievement of the Client’s goals, but these coaches also seem to commit themselves to the long term development of the Client;

bullet point They believe that letting the Client find his/her own answers fosters learning, growth, independence, responsibility, pro-activity, creativity, reliability, constructiveness and trust.

bullet point They claim that a more non-directive approach still helps the Client achieve his/her goal, and also empowers them with new (or better awakened) skills and confidence to do that again on his/her own.

I myself am part of the second group, because beyond helping my clients achieve their goals, I want to fulfill my Mission. That Mission is to use my talents and help create an environment in which a person can experience warmth, respect, empathy and UPR, challenge and support, so that he/she feels free to express themselves, their needs, doubts, fears, wishes and dreams. An environment which motivates a person to reflect, create, take responsibility and act. I believe such conditions, together with the questions I ask and the feedback I give, foster development and growth, and help people flourish, release their potential and get the most out of themselves.

Choosing for the Client would mean that I am not congruent with my Mission, with my Values, with myself. It would mean that all I say I do and believe is actually a Lie. I don’t mean to say that I am right and that every coach has to do what I do. All I mean is that I can’t do otherwise.

I understand it seems like I choose for Coaching and not for the Client, but deep inside I know I choose for the Client and not for myself.

What about you? To which extent do you identify with this dilemma? How do you deal with it? Your feedback, opinion and experience are welcome.

About the author

ProfielSandro da Silva is a Dutch business and life coach who from time to time shares his experiences with coaching in his own blog. He starts his days by reading, selecting and tweeting his favorite articles about leadership, management, business, change, diversity, development and start-ups. A different selection of articles, targeted at executives and the C-suite, is posted everyday on his LinkedIn page. He talks to his life coaching audience via his Facebook page.

 

You can read more about him on his website (translation in progress) or contact him by filling out this form.


Defence is the first act of war 7

One of the most read guest posts from last year was by successful coach Chris Morris (You can read his first guest post here )

This week Chris returns with a post sharing more valuable thoughts from his coaching experience and approach.

Defence is the first act of war

By Chris Morris

When I trained to be a coach, my first few teachers hammered home the idea that we weren’t supposed to offer our own opinions or advice; we were only supposed to be like robots, basically, using a toolset to tweak the client’s configuration until they began operating at their peak performance. At that point we’d then recommend a maintenance regime, install anti-virus, metabolism boosts and so on. Does that evocation of coaching feel cold and robotic to you? It felt cold and robotic to me. But when I looked around the training room I noticed a lot of enthusiastic nodding. Was it possible that a room of thoughtful people had all aligned on this issue? From my position, all I’d seen was the trainers building a dodgy link between “imposing your map of the world onto others” and “thinking you’re better than others”, and then associating feelings of arrogance, pomposity, vanity with “thinking you’re better than others”. It was hypno-speak at its sloppiest. But many people from that training didn’t question it – they’d moved away from “imposing your map of the world onto others” and nodded forward into a vacuum.

I was reflecting on this today and a weird thought smacked me on the nose. Not only do I always impose my map on my clients’ – that’s pretty much all I do. So here I am writing something that’s supposed to be for the benefit of coaches and I realise I need a nice picture to distract you.

Barnaby

This is my dog, Barnaby. He’s wonderfully sprightly for an eleven-year-old of his breed – the only sign of age we’ve noticed is his (partial) deafness.

As with most deaf creatures, Barnaby (Dr Barn to his friends) can still hear some things. It affects us differently when our keys jingle or when a deep baseline thumps out a repetitive rhythm. We have a range of sounds we can hear and a wider range that affects us in other ways, and my sense is we sometimes forget to keep extending those ranges through choice. We express ourselves through sound. Persona means through sound and I think most of us filter our sense of self through the experiences we have with sound, both verbally and non-verbally, consciously and unconsciously.

It’s been interesting to see how friends and family have responded to Dr Barn’s deafly behaviour – many accusing him of “selective deafness”. “Oh, he still hears when you’re putting his food out” jokes Marjorie, (metal food bowl = clink clink, high pitch). “He doesn’t hear me when I tell him to move out the way”, booms Michael (deeeep resonant voice). “I had an aunt like that once”, said my cousin. “She had everyone running around after her.”

It seems a wonderfully human idea to model a dog as if it’s a human. We watch someone and ask ourselves “what would have to be true for me to behave like that?”. Since most of us aren’t keen on changing, everyone else in the world immediately starts at a disadvantage. Then we bewilder ourselves by applying lightning-fast logical thinking to fleeting sensory experiences, and we boil it up by somehow believing our own thoughts are real while other people’s aren’t so much. “We have made a god that likes to be worshipped on a Sunday and they’ve made one that likes it on Tuesdays. Should we convert them or kill them?”

“Depends. What type of hat do they wear while they pray?”

My intention isn’t to impose my map onto my client’s world but instead to super-impose my map over their map, reflecting a way of being in their map that they experience as different.

That makes one big assumption, and it’s also why I love my job. Experiencing my world through a map that largely reflects a map of another map – and holding that at the level of deep assumptions, 4th and 5th order presuppositions, verbally and non-verbally, because that’s the only way to make it instantly accessible as unconscious competence – is the most fun I’ve had with my clothes on. Holding it for an hour or more is an amazing feeling. So I know it sounds wacky to many people but I love that experience of seeing someone start to see what they’ve always seen but in a new way, and that’s why I love transformative coaching. The only way I know to be positively involved in that dynamic is to be cleanly in my own space of undefended being – no role, no mask – and I think that’s a wonderful pre-condition of being a good transformative coach. We have to be our own best clients. We have to love ourselves first. And what a wonderful job it is when our job is to be truly, wonderfully, authentically ourselves, whatever context or map we find ourselves experiencing.

About the Author/Further Resources

Chris Morris is a coach, psychotherapist and the creator of a process called Be Brighter.